Raised by a radical feminist

Speaking out the truth.

source link: click here



...and the words that deceive these poor young ladies, found in video below (or at the source link above).




"When one fears and flees from the truth, they are devoured by the deceived."

"The generation of false feminism, an era of deception and destruction to the very ones whom they claim to stand for."

The (Right) to (Privacy), and its distorted redefinition in our culture.

An eye opening book to read. The Right to Privacy http://www.mercatornet.com/articles/view/the_rights_and_wrongs_of_privacy/

....During the 1960s the courts invented a whole new meaning for the 'right to privacy' that was not true to its original meaning/to objective truth/to the Constitution. During the past four decades, things that were previously considered crimes have been turned into 'rights'.....

 Dr. Janet E Smith turns on the lights regarding the "right to privacy".  The influence this has had on our current culture is devastating. (the seeds of the culture of death-now this culture's normative direction)

....abortion, assisted suicide, homosexual acts, and more in the United States, has taken place under the banner of a “right to privacy” supposedly protected by the Constitution.....

What are your thoughts on the current debate about gay marriage?

As a philosopher the thing that strikes me most is the brilliant strategy of the gay marriage movement. Like Orwell in 1984 it sees that the main battlefield is language. If they can redefine a key term like "marriage" they win. Control language and you control thought; control thought and you control action; control action and you control the world. Mussolini knew that too. He made it illegal for Italians to say "hi" in the traditional way. The Italian for "how are you?" is "Come sta lei?" "Lei" is the feminine inclusive pronoun. Fascist ideology held that this was emasculating and weak, so you had to say "Come sta lui?" from now on. "Lui" is the masculine pronoun. So no one could say "hi" in Italy without identifying themselves as pro or anti-fascist.

In America, the feminists have succeeded in exactly the same way. They've labeled the traditional inclusive language, the language of every single one of the great books of Western civilization written in English, as exclusive because it uses "he" and "man" to include women; and they've labeled their new artificial ideological invention, which insists, contrary to historical fact, that "he" and "man" exclude women--they've labeled this "inclusive" language. And amazingly, nearly everyone follows like sheep! So it will be easy, I think, for them to redefine marriage. Hell, they've already redefined "human beings" or "persons" so that they can murder the littlest ones whenever they want to. Why should they feel any guilt about dishonesty when they don't feel any guilt about murder?

I think you will find that there is an overwhelmingly strong connection between these three agendas: gay marriage, feminism, and abortion. Very seldom do you find people who are for one but not the other, or against one but not the other. And what they all have in common is this attitude toward language: it is what the most powerful and insidious propaganda film in history called "the triumph of the will." Already in Canada it is a crime, punishable by a fine or even imprisonment, to speak against homosexuality in public. Politically incorrect ideas, such as Biblical morality, are now defined as "hate speech."

One of the things I fear from this is an ugly backlash against homosexuals. If the truth is now whatever we will, then just as there is nothing to stop society today from redefining marriage, there is nothing to stop it tomorrow from redefining personal dignity and rights so as to take them away from homosexuals. The Nazis did exactly that. The Church is the best friend of homosexuals, both because she tells them they are made in God's image and have intrinsic dignity and rights and are called to be saints, and because she is the only social force left that insists on moral absolutes--so when they sin against themselves she says NO, just as she does to heterosexuals who sin against themselves sexually, but when others sin against them she says NO also. No one else dares to say NO. She speaks up for everyone, including homosexuals.

 -Dr Peter Kreeft

source link: click here

Be Sober!

“Be sober and vigilant: because your enemy the devil, like a roaring lion, is roaming around seeking whom he might devour.  Strong in faith, resist him knowing that the same affliction befalls your brethren who are in the world. ” 1 Peter 5:8-9.

click here to read this blog...

Archbishop Fulton Sheen, on love...

"Love implies knowledge:
The intellect sets up the goal or target. The will is the bow and the arrow combined directed to that target"

"Just as to speak means to produce a word and to flower means to produce blossoms, so to love is to breathe love, or to sigh or spirate"

"A kiss is a mere sign of love, but it is a giving of one's breath or spirit, which is inseparable from life itself."

The Person and the Family

"Aristotle points out that 'to live is to be' and that man is essentially a social animal. This is why you can make a strictly anthropological case for marriage.  To find ourselves we have to get out of ourselves. A couple need the interpersonal connections that happen in the intimacy of the home if they are to really flourish. We were not created to remain alone.  We are not what modern culture increasingly supposes: autonomous entities bouncing off one another."

a profound piece to bookmark

 On the behavior and thinking rooted in turning our awesome religion of truth into some religion of "Opinion"

The reality here is the clarity in defining in context a type of "Liberalism".... (link found below).

What do I mean by ‘Liberalism?’

Liberalism in religion is the doctrine that there is no positive truth in religion, but that one creed is as good as another, and this is the teaching which is gaining force and substance daily. It is inconsistent with any recognition of any religion, as true. It teaches that all are to be tolerated, for all are matters of opinion. Revealed religion is not a truth, but a sentiment and a taste; not an objective fact, not miraculous; and it is the right of each individual to make it say just what strikes his fancy. Devotion is not necessarily founded on faith. Men may go to Protestant Churches and to Catholic, may get good from both and belong to neither. They may fraternize together in spiritual thoughts and feelings, without having any views at all of doctrine in common, or seeing the need of them. (Blessed John Henry Newman’s Roman Address of 1879 as quoted in “Letters to a Young Catholic” by George Weigel)

Continue to the source link article here